Gene, Gene the Dancing Machine
There’s an interesting article in the San Jose Mercury News about the impact genetics and the mapping of the human genome is having on the study of history and archeology. I’ve heard some of this before, but the article seems like a decent summary of where things stand right now. For example, the genetic evidence supports the theory that there was a single point of origin for humans about 130,000 years ago. And the genetic differences between different ethnic groups are so trivial as to be virtually nonexistent. When I was young and unsophisticated, I used to think that ethnic groups were well-defined and demarcated, but as I’ve learned more, and particularly since I started researching my family history, the more I’ve come to realize that ethnic groups are fluid and changing, and that it’s possible for a family to be one thing in one generation and consider themselves something else a couple of generations later. Of course, it’s also possible for groups to maintain a distinct identity for centuries, as in the case of German settlers in Ukraine, or the Amish in Pennsylvania and Indiana. But the distinctions are all cultural; the genes just don’t support the idea that there are significant differences between humans.
Posted at 8:11 PM