Blather
In keeping with my general inclination to avoid television for everything but college football and major breaking news, I’ve been spending a lot of time in front of the tube the past couple of days. I’m not terribly impressed with what I’ve seen. I think the "embedding" of journalists with the forces was a masterful move by the military; thanks to this, we get endless pictures that signify nothing. Grainy green Fisher-Price Pixelvision shots of glows on the horizon, or maybe indeterminate lumps that may or may not be Our Correspondent. Endless speculation by former military leaders about whether or not it was really Saddam Hussein on television after the first attack. Cheerleading about how "we" are doing (no journalistic objectivity for us, thank you). It’s really been at about the level I expected, which is to say, pretty bad.
Ultimately, I have to judge the progress of the war by what Dan Rather is wearing when he’s on camera. I’ve long used The Dan Rather Sartorial Index as my measure of how important a story is. In normal times, he wears a suit and tie. For important stories, he will sometimes wear a sweater or a polo shirt, or maybe native Afghan dress. As the seriousness of the situation increases, his dress gets more casual. I’ve long felt that if the world were to come to an end, Rather would be there to tell us about it unshaven in boxer shorts and a guinea-tee. At the moment, he’s still wearing a suit. So clearly, the story isn’t important enough for me to bother watching.
Posted at 10:32 AM
i know you live in new jersey, ralph, but "guinea-tee" is an ethnic slur nonetheless. do you want to risk offending a member of the coalition of the willing?
Posted by shirley at 2:17 PM, March 21, 2003 [Link]